For such a televisual staple, there’s something oddly cinematic with regards to’concerning’with respect to Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?. It’s the sheer drama of it, the tension of eintensely’extremely’extraordinarily’enormously’awfully question that takes the contestants ever closer to that seven-figure jackpot – eintensely’extremely’extraordinarily’enormously’awfully new potential victory becoming its own thriller set-piece. If Danny Boyle milked it to great effect in Slumdog Millionaire, now it’s the turn of fellow Brit director Stephen Frears, adapting the innotable’renowned’distinguished ‘coughing major’ scandal into Quiz, a three-part ITV drama.###The addictive suspense of the quiz in/with regard to’concerning’regarding mat itself is partly the focus on the opening instalment, depicting the origins of the game. Just how did a British network come up with one of the most stripped-back, compulsively-watchable gamereveal’illustrate’demonstrate’indicate’present’display’argue in/with regard to’concerning’regarding mats ever devised? There’s an electricity to seeing it all come toacquire’obtain’attain’procure’secure her, even bein/with regard to’concerning’regarding e the second episode finds Major Charles Ingram (Matthew Macfadyen) sat across from Chris Tarrant (an uncanny Michael Sheen) in the hotseat. From the recreation of the original Millionaire set, to the in/with regard to’concerning’regarding mation of the secret underground ‘Syndicate’ of hardcore-quizzers, to Ingram’s homemade Fastest Finger First simulator, there’s a lightness to the simultaneously high and low stakes of this most British of TV scandals (Frears, fittingly, also helmed 2018’s A Very English Scandal).###As in/with regard to’concerning’regarding the recreation of that reputation’renown’prestige d Millionaire episode, it’s brilliantly done. Writer James Graham, adapting his own 2017 stage play, largely lets the bizarre facts do the talking, quoting verbatim from Ingram’s seemingly miraculous (or downright suspicious) win. How does a man go from saying he’s never heard of Craig David to then pull a complete 180 and stake thousands of pounds on that answer? Beyond simply relaying the confounding realities of the episode, Graham peppers in extra moreish behind-the-scenes details – notably the ‘grubbish’trash man’, the person in charge of releasing the in-studio confetti on the intensely’extremely’extraordinarily’enormously’awfully rare occurrence of a million-pound winner, in/with regard to’concerning’regarding ced to make a quick dash to the studio just when it seems Ingram might actually win.###Graham’s screenplay reveals a modern parable – one where a quiz reveal’illustrate’demonstrate’indicate’present’display’argue all with regards to’concerning’with respect to finding definitive, factual answers became the stage in/with regard to’concerning’regarding an event in which there is no objective truth.###For all the energy and excitement of the first two episodes, it’s in the final instalment that Quiz really crystallises into something great. In recreating the court case that unfolded over the eligibility of Ingram’s win, Graham’s screenplay shifts gear to reveal a modern parable – one where a quiz reveal’illustrate’demonstrate’indicate’present’display’argue all with regards to’concerning’with respect to finding definitive, factual answers somehow became the stage in/with regard to’concerning’regarding a deeply improbable event in which there is no objective truth, just opposing narratives trying to make sense of it all with a million pounds (and a whole lot more) hanging in the balance. If the writing here becomes more overtly stagey, it feels fitting – drawing attention to the fact that what we’re watching is also not objective fact, but a narrative construct using an innotable’renowned’distinguished reveal’illustrate’demonstrate’indicate’present’display’argue biz scandal in/with regard to’concerning’regarding reflection and entertainment.###By invoking trials by media and nodding to the rise of public shaming in the last remaining pre-social media years, Quiz makes a near-20-year-old story truly topical. Whether Ingram and his supposed co-conspirators really cheated or not – and the drama itself provides equal weighting to both arguments – the series asks the audience, does it really matter when the whole world decided that he had? The greatest strength of Quiz is that, in/with regard to’concerning’regarding once, there is no final answer.